Connect with us

Finance

Elizabeth Warren’s new plan: Break up Amazon, Google and Facebook – CNNPolitics

(CNN) Sen. Elizabeth Warren released an aggressive plan on Friday to break up tech giants like Amazon, Google and Facebook, targeting the power of Silicon Valley with her populist message as sprawling Internet giants face mounting political backlash ahead of the 2020 presidential election. The far-reaching proposal would impose new rules on certain kinds of…

Editor Team

Published

on

Elizabeth Warren’s new plan: Break up Amazon, Google and Facebook – CNNPolitics

(CNN) Sen. Elizabeth Warren released an aggressive plan on Friday to break up tech giants like Amazon, Google and Facebook, targeting the power of Silicon Valley with her populist message as sprawling Internet giants face mounting political backlash ahead of the 2020 presidential election.
The far-reaching proposal would impose new rules on certain kinds of tech companies with $25 billion or more in annual revenue, forcing Amazon and Google to spin off parts of their companies and relinquish their overwhelming control over online commerce. The plan also aims to unwind some of the highest profile mergers in the industry, like the combinations of Amazon and Whole Foods, and Google and DoubleClick, as well as Facebook’s acquisition of Instagram and WhatsApp. The proposal from the Democratic presidential candidate is sure to rankle Silicon Valley executives and investors as well as opponents of government regulations, while drawing applause from progressive activists, consumer advocates and a range of lawmakers who have railed against what they see as unsustainable monopolies in the industry. Warren’s presidential campaign shared with CNN details of the plan, which outlines specific measures to break up large tech companies.

It marks the Massachusetts Democrat’s third major policy unveiling so far this year and is yet another sign that the progressive firebrand intends to set herself apart in a growing Democratic field by laying out an ambitious agenda centered around her campaign’s overarching theme of dismantling wealthy and powerful interests.

Elizabeth Warren to release universal child care plan paid by ‘wealth tax’ “Today’s big tech companies have too much power — too much power over our economy, our society, and our democracy. They’ve bulldozed competition, used our private information for profit, and tilted the playing field against everyone else. And in the process, they have hurt small businesses and stifled innovation,” Warren wrote in a Medium post about the proposal. “That’s why my Administration will make big, structural changes to the tech sector to promote more competition—including breaking up Amazon, Facebook, and Google.” Read More According to a source familiar with her plans, Warren is expected to promote the new proposal Friday evening in Long Island City, where Amazon recently backed out of its plan to build a massive campus after facing intense political backlash.

The senator is also headed to the South by Southwest Conference in Austin, Texas, on Saturday. Pressed on whether it was a mistake for the Obama administration to approve some of the major tech mergers that she now wants to unwind, Warren told CNN in an interview Friday afternoon in Harlem: “I don’t think it’s the right decision.” “I want the regulators to go back and look,” Warren said. “I think the right decision is to say competition is protected if, once you get that big, you’re not allowed to eat your competitors.

” Asked what her message would be for Amazon CEO Jeff Bezos and Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg, Warren responded: “Good for you. You’ve built a great company. But you don’t get to use the benefits of having built a platform to suck up information about every buyer and every seller and then use that information that nobody else can get access to — to let you out-compete the next little business that’s trying to get a foothold.” The senator declined to directly answer the question of whether she would have supported Amazon choosing Boston as the site of its second headquarters.

“What I’m not okay with is the fact that cities are put into this competition against each other, and that they’re asked to give up tax revenues, to build special goods,” she told CNN. Warren’s proposal was greeted with a cheer from New York State Sen. Julia Salazar, a Democratic Socialist ally of freshman Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and a vocal opponent of New York’s deal to bring Amazon’s second headquarters to Queens.

“I’m glad to see the dangers of monopolistic market power being taken seriously by a leading presidential candidate,” Salazar said in a statement. “Gov. Andrew Cuomo and other pro-Amazon politicians need to see the danger of sublimating all facets of our daily lives into a single all-encompassing company, which is clearly Amazon’s business model.” The proposal is likely to spur debate in the rest of the Democratic field, which includes hard-charging candidates like Warren but also others who have taken substantial sums of money from Silicon Valley. A Warren aide told CNN the senator has not yet discussed her proposal with colleagues in Congress. The plan would pose existential threats to the business models that turned certain giant tech firms into money spigots. Elizabeth Warren pitches new ‘wealth tax’ on richest Americans Separating Google’s ad business from its Search function, for example, would make Google ads — on which the company depends for nearly all of its revenue — much less valuable. So would requiring Google to divest DoubleClick, the company it acquired in 2008 that vastly expanded the reach of its advertising network.

Warren’s proposal would also prevent Amazon from selling its own branded products through its platform, resulting in lost revenue for the company but not killing the business model of taking a cut of every other transaction on the website. The move would alleviate one of the biggest concerns of other sellers on the marketplace — that Amazon can determine which products are featured and promoted more prominently. Warren’s use of the $25 billion in annual revenue as a measure is notable because currently, antitrust enforcement largely depends on complex and ambiguous legal tests around factors like market share and evidence of price gouging. “I want to make sure that the next generation of great American tech companies can flourish,” Warren wrote in the Medium post.

“To do that, we need to stop this generation of big tech companies from throwing around their political power to shape the rules in their favor and throwing around their economic power to snuff out or buy up every potential competitor.” Ahead of Warren’s visit to New York on Friday, State Sen. Mike Gianaris, who represents Long Island City and whose opposition threatened to scuttle Amazon’s deal before the company retreated, said, “I am proud the progressive movement in our country runs through Queens. It’s only natural that Presidential candidates are spreading their message in western Queens and I look forward to hearing what Senator Warren has to offer.” .

Invests are pleased to have a team of talented correspondents, who are able to bring you quality content on a daily basis. The editorial team cover every industry and have leading market experts from the stock market, ex military journalists, cryptocurrency to health and lifestyle. If it’s important to you it’s important to us and we’ve got the best in the business bringing it to you.

Finance

There are 3 fundamental money concepts most people still don’t grasp

Author and financial expert David Bach says many people still don’t understand some personal finance basics. Bach is a champion of the “pay yourself first” strategy, which prioritizes automatic savings . He also says it’s important to understand how your money can grow in a retirement account, and that you can’t predict the stock market.…

Editor Team

Published

on

There are 3 fundamental money concepts most people still don’t grasp

Author and financial expert David Bach says many people still don’t understand some personal finance basics. Bach is a champion of the “pay yourself first” strategy, which prioritizes automatic savings . He also says it’s important to understand how your money can grow in a retirement account, and that you can’t predict the stock market. Personal finance is a complicated subject, and chances are you weren’t required to take an introductory financial literacy course in high school or college.

Perhaps you, like me, were left to school yourself on topics like investing, taxes , debt, and saving for retirement once you entered adulthood.

As commendable as that may be, David Bach, who has spent 25 years in the wealth management industry and is the author of ” The Automatic Millionaire ,” says there are three simple, basic money concepts that many of us are still missing.

1. You need to ‘pay yourself first’ “People still don’t grasp the fact that they need to save a dime out of every dollar,” Bach told previously Business Insider in a Facebook Live interview . He said that the average American who’s saving money is saving just 15 minutes a day of their income, when they should be saving an hour .
Bach noted troubling research from the Federal Reserve that revealed nearly half of Americans wouldn’t have enough money on hand to cover a $400 emergency. Yet, he continued, millions of those people will buy a coffee at Starbucks today and expect to buy the new $800 iPhone next year. Americans have money, he says, but we aren’t saving it.

“It’s an American crisis. That’s why I’m still doing this at 50, because there’s still so many people that aren’t getting it,” Bach said.
So get on the “pay-yourself-first plan,” as Bach calls it, and automatically save an hour a day of your income. “When that money is moved before you can touch it, that’s how real wealth is built,” Bach, who became a millionaire by age 30 by increasing his automated savings over several years , told Business Insider.

Check out these offers from our partners to grow your savings:
2. You don’t ‘buy’ a retirement account Bach says that many Americans are confused by IRAs and 401(k)s and believe that they “own” a retirement account.
In reality, he says, “the retirement account is just a bucket and their investment is put inside that bucket. It’s those investments that go inside that bucket that create the return.


When you sign up for an employer-sponsored 401(k) you are contributing a designated percentage of your pretax income to that “bucket.

” As time passes, that money will compound and grow tax-free until you withdraw it upon retirement. In 2019, you can contribute up to $19,000 to your 401(k), or $25,000 if you’re over age 50.
Find out how much money you’ll need for retirement:
If you open up an individual retirement account, like a traditional IRA or Roth IRA , you can contribute up to $6,000, or $7,000 if you’re over 50, to each account in 2019.

The money in a traditional IRA will grow tax-free but is taxed upon retirement, whereas the money in a Roth IRA will be taxed before it goes into the account and is tax-free to withdraw upon retirement.
3. The stock market isn’t predictable Investing in the stock market is risky business , and it isn’t for everyone.
Still, Bach says he’s “constantly surprised” that people think they’re going to figure out the best time to buy and sell stocks by watching a TV show or reading an article. Unfortunately, the stock market is incredibly hard to predict, and trying to time it is often fruitless.
“You’d be better off with a boring, balanced approach that you invest systematically every two weeks and you leave it alone for your lifetime,” Bach said.

“And that’s not sexy, and that may not sell, but that’s what works.”
Personal Finance Insider offers tools and calculators to help you make smart decisions with your money.

We do not give investment advice or encourage you to buy or sell stocks or other financial products. What you decide to do with your money is up to you. If you take action based on one of the recommendations listed in the calculator, we get a small share of the revenue from our commerce partners..

Continue Reading

Finance

Dollar General will open 975 stores this year – CNN

New York (CNN Business) Dollar General keeps expanding even as discount rivals like Family Dollar shrink. The company said Thursday it will open 975 new stores in the United States this year. Dollar General will remodel 1,000 older stores with new queue lines to drive last-minute impulse buys. It will also spruce up its health…

Editor Team

Published

on

Dollar General will open 975 stores this year – CNN

New York (CNN Business) Dollar General keeps expanding even as discount rivals like Family Dollar shrink.
The company said Thursday it will open 975 new stores in the United States this year. Dollar General will remodel 1,000 older stores with new queue lines to drive last-minute impulse buys. It will also spruce up its health and beauty sections to lift sales. Dollar General has been growing for years in rural America. Dollar General ( DG ) opened 900 stores in 2018 and 1,315 the year prior. It has more than 15,300 stores across the country and sales have increased for 29 straight years. Despite a strong economy today, the uneven recovery in the United States has buoyed Dollar General .

“While the economy is doing very well, our core customer continues to struggle,” Dollar General chief executive Todd Vasos told analysts last year. Vasos said on Thursday that Dollar General is preparing for the consumer environment to weaken in the second half of the year. Read More The chain caters mainly to low-and-middle-income customers in rural and suburban areas. That helps it stand out against suburban chains like Dollar Tree ( DLTR ) and Family Dollar, which focuses on urban customers.

Family Dollar has struggled in recent years and will close nearly 400 stores this year . Family Dollar will close nearly 400 stores Dollar General looks to build stores in rural areas where big box retailers or grocery stores are not within 15 or 20 miles. That gives the company close proximity to shoppers and compels more frequent store visits.

The company says 75% of its locations are in towns with 20,000 or fewer people. Dollar General even surged during the holidays. Dollar General’s sales at stores open at least a year increased 4% during its most recent quarter compared with a year earlier, beating analysts’ expectations. The US government shutdown boosted Dollar General sales by 0.7% last quarter because the Agriculture Department doled out February SNAP benefits early, the company said.

It also got a lift from more shoppers buying food and home products, such as kitchenware and small appliances.

Despite strong sales, Dollar General’s stock dropped around 9% in early trading Thursday. Dollar General said it lowered prices on some merchandise during the holidays to win market share, but that dented its profit margins. Its profit forecast for 2019 also fell short of Wall Street’s expectations. The company wants to get current customers to spend more at stores and reach new shoppers, so it plans to introduce its own cosmetics and baby product brands this year.

Dollar General will also focus on selling more groceries and fresh food to grow its business. It is adding produce sections and refrigerators to hundreds of stores. Dollar General has said that offering fruit and vegetables at stores in rural and urban food deserts can “drive a tremendous amount of traffic.” The strategy could help Dollar General compete with bigger rivals such as Walmart ( WMT ) and beat back the threat of German discount grocery chains Aldi and Lidl. Aldi has poured billions of dollars into new stores with fresh food sections.

Lidl acquired a couple dozen Best Market grocery stores in New York and New Jersey last month. In addition, the company will roll out buy online, pickup in store at select stores for the first time later this year, a sign that Dollar General believes the popular digital option will take off in rural areas. Correction: An earlier version of this article misstated the number of Dollar General stores in the United States..

Continue Reading

Finance

A new survey shows that zero top US economists agreed with the basic principles of an economic theory supported by Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez

J. Scott Applewhite/AP Images Modern Monetary Theory is becoming a larger part of the economic conversation. The theory posits that government deficits are less concerning if a country controls its own currency and issues debt in that currency. MMT says the amount a government can spend is limited by real assets and the debt’s effect…

Editor Team

Published

on

A new survey shows that zero top US economists agreed with the basic principles of an economic theory supported by Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez

J. Scott Applewhite/AP Images Modern Monetary Theory is becoming a larger part of the economic conversation. The theory posits that government deficits are less concerning if a country controls its own currency and issues debt in that currency. MMT says the amount a government can spend is limited by real assets and the debt’s effect on the broader economy. MMT has received a huge amount of pushback. In a new survey, not a single mainstream economist agreed with the basic aspects of MMT. Modern Monetary Theory is having a moment.

The once fringe idea, known as MMT , has been vaulted into the national conversation as progressive economists and some politicians seize hold of the economic theory. Even Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell has weighed in on MMT . But a new survey has found that while MMT may be getting attention, it does not have much support among some of the top US economists. Put (very) simply, MMT posits that a country that controls its own currency can continue to pay down its debt as long as it is denominated in that currency. So because the US prints dollars and issues debt in dollars, it can pay down its debts and does not need to rely on taxes to fund debt issuance.

Instead, the theory says, a country in the aforementioned situation is limited by the availability of real assets. So while we can’t just ignore the national debt, unlike a household budget the debt number — such as the US’s record $22 trillion debt load — doesn’t matter until inflation and economic effects show up. Explained to Marketplace by the economist Stephanie Kelton, an MMT proponent, Congress would use fiscal policy to control how much money goes into the economy. To borrow Marketplace’s metaphor, Congress would be a sink faucet, money would be the water, and the stoppered sink bowl would be the economy.

To deal with inflation (an overflow out of the bowl) you can lessen the flow of water into the bowl. Taxes would also act as the stopper letting money out of the economy sink bowl. The idea has gained a following among progressive economists and some politicians. Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez of New York told Business Insider in January that MMT should be “a larger part of our conversation.

” Read more: Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez says the theory that deficit spending is good for the economy should ‘absolutely’ be part of the conversation But the idea has also faced intense pushback from economists and pundits across the political spectrum , and none of the mainstream economists interviewed in a new survey were ready to sign on to the idea just yet. In the latest survey of 42 of America’s top economists by the University of Chicago Booth School of Business, not a single respondent agreed with the basic aspects of MMT: Thirty-six percent of economists disagreed, and 52% strongly disagreed with the statement “Countries that borrow in their own currency should not worry about government deficits because they can always create money to finance their debt.” (Two percent had no opinion.) Twenty-six percent of economists disagreed, and 57% of economists strongly disagreed with the statement “Countries that borrow in their own currency can finance as much real government spending as they want by creating money.” (Seven percent had no opinion.) Some the responding economists said continued debt issuance would lead to persistent inflation problems and expressed concern about the long-term sustainability of MMT. .

Continue Reading

Trending