Connect with us

Technology

Tesla CEO Elon Musk employees

Shares of Tesla ( TSLA ) are under pressure once again on a slew of recent reports that shed light on Elon Musk’s leadership style. And it calls into question whether employees believe he is suited to lead the company. Yahoo Finance commissioned Blind , an anonymous workplace community, to survey employees of Tesla and…

Editor Team

Published

on

Tesla CEO Elon Musk employees

imageShares of Tesla ( TSLA ) are under pressure once again on a slew of recent reports that shed light on Elon Musk’s leadership style. And it calls into question whether employees believe he is suited to lead the company.
Yahoo Finance commissioned Blind , an anonymous workplace community, to survey employees of Tesla and Musk’s aerospace company, SpaceX, after a double dose of bad news last week — that Tesla is shuttering most of its stores, and that the SEC is seeking to hold Musk in contempt over recent tweets about the company.
(Yahoo Finance/David Foster/Aarthi Swaminathan) More A total of 235 people took the survey, with 131 employees, or 55.

74% of respondents, saying they were confident that Musk is fit to lead the electric carmaker. Blind said that 104, or 44.

26%, are not confident that Musk is fit to lead.

Blind conducted a survey less than two weeks earlier showing that over 77% of Tesla and SpaceX employees were confident he was fit to lead.

The latest bad news for Tesla Last week, the electric carmaker announced plans to shutter most of its stores and transition to online-only purchasing. This caught many employees by surprise and several salespeople only found out about the move through a public post from the “Tesla team,” according to new reporting from Bloomberg.
Elon Musk, CEO of SpaceX, speaks during a news conference after the SpaceX Falcon 9 Demo-1 launch at the Kennedy Space Center in Cape Canaveral, Fla., Saturday, March 2, 2019. (AP Photo/John Raoux) More Musk has also had a contentious relationship with the SEC mostly stemming from his tweeting. He and Tesla each agreed to pay $20 million over Musk’s tweet that he was “considering taking Tesla private at $420” in his now-infamous “funding secured” claim.

As part of the settlement, Musk had to step down as chairman of the company and also agreed to get legal approval for any tweet that could materially impact the company.
SEC officials claimed last week that Musk violated the settlement when he tweeted that Tesla would produce 500,000 cars in 2019 .

Several hours later he tweeted a follow-up , noting “deliveries for year still estimated to be about 400k.”
‘I am confident in Elon Musk’s ability to lead’ Before last week, Tesla still faced scrutiny from all sides — legislators, shareholders, activist investors, media, and not to mention former executives who have left. Given that scrutiny, Blind conducted a survey from February 14 to February 21 to gauge how much current employees believe that Musk is fit to lead.
Blind, which requires users to sign up with their corporate email accounts, has 1,400 Tesla and 250 SpaceX employees on the platform.

The survey asked the collective 1,650 employees to answer with TRUE or FALSE to this statement: “I am confident in Elon Musk’s ability to lead the company .”
Initially, the survey ran from February 14 to February 21, 2019 and was answered by 284 people. Blind said that 221 people, or 77.82% of respondents, said they believe that statement while only 63, or 22.

18%, said they do not. Users could only answer once, and this is a purely quantitative survey, with no room for respondents to explain their vote..

Invests are pleased to have a team of talented correspondents, who are able to bring you quality content on a daily basis. The editorial team cover every industry and have leading market experts from the stock market, ex military journalists, cryptocurrency to health and lifestyle. If it’s important to you it’s important to us and we’ve got the best in the business bringing it to you.

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Technology

‘The future of the human race’: Scientists call for temporary global ban on gene-edited babies

Share on Reddit reddit Concerns over the creation of a sub species of humans has led to a call from global scientists for a temporary ban on the use of powerful DNA editing tools to make genetically modified children. The move is intended to send a clear message to rogue international scientists that experiments to…

Editor Team

Published

on

‘The future of the human race’: Scientists call for temporary global ban on gene-edited babies

imageShare on Reddit reddit Concerns over the creation of a sub species of humans has led to a call from global scientists for a temporary ban on the use of powerful DNA editing tools to make genetically modified children. The move is intended to send a clear message to rogue international scientists that experiments to rewrite the DNA of sperm, eggs or embryos destined for live births is unacceptable. The demand for a global moratorium on the issue comes after last November’s shocking announcement that gene-edited twins had been born in China in an experiment that was widely condemned by the scientific community. Mainstream scientists generally oppose making babies with altered DNA, citing concern over tinkering with heritable genes. Such genetic changes may be passed to future generations, unlike gene editing done in parts of the body not involved in reproduction. Advertisement Advertise with NZME.

The need for a moratorium has been cited by 18 researchers from seven countries who published a commentary in the journal Nature. “There has been growing interest in proposals for genetic enhancement of humans,” the scientists noted. But the potential risks are too great without scientists agreeing to international standards or controls. The idea is that a moratorium “will place major speed bumps in front of the most adventurous plans to re-engineer the human species”.

Professor John Rasko from the University of Sydney School of Medicine supports the ban despite harbouring fears the horse has already bolted. “The subtlety here is that we thought we’d already asked for a moratorium,” he told ABC radio this morning. “I’ve always been of the opinion that the future of the human race is through an international framework, through guidelines, through regulatory embrace.” Roughly 30 nations already prohibit making gene-edited babies, and the desire for a global “pause” on the science is largely aimed at China. The country has drawn the ire of the scientific and medical community after Dr He Jiankui claimed he had altered human embryos with a powerful new tool resulting in the birth of genetically edited twin girls.

The incident is often referred to as the CRISPR baby scandal because of the scientific technique used in the experiment. CRISPR is a recently emerged technology that can be thought of as acting like a tiny pair of molecular scissors that can cut and alter nucleotides that make up DNA, enabling scientists to find and modify or replace genetic defects. It has the potential to help us fix diseases that have plagued humans for millennia. But if we get it wrong, we could do irreparable harm to all the generations to come. There is a plausible concern that such a technique could accidentally introduce an error into the human gene pool, thereby inadvertently creating a new disease that could be passed on for generations.

The use of CRISPR has also set off a fierce debate about the ethical implications of potentially using the cutting-edge science to pick and choose the human condition. Despite the lack of understanding about the precise heritability of intelligence, it is plausible that CRISPR could be used to enhance the intellect of unborn babies, not just their physical traits. Among the proposals voiced by international researchers calling for a moratorium is for individual nations to pledge to block such research for a specific period, perhaps five years. Following that, each country could decide on its own about what to allow but only after taking steps like providing public notice, joining international discussions and determining whether its citizens support proceeding with such gene editing.

The proposal does not cover gene-editing experiments that don’t involve trying to establish a pregnancy. Herald recommends.

Continue Reading

Technology

Think we should be at school? Today’s climate strike is the biggest lesson of all | Greta Thunberg and others | Opinion

Greta Thunberg and her fellow climate change strikers around the world urge adults to join their fight. I t started in front of the Swedish parliament, on 20 August – a regular school day. Greta Thunberg sat with her painted sign and some homemade flyers . This was the first school climate strike . Fridays…

Editor Team

Published

on

Think we should be at school? Today’s climate strike is the biggest lesson of all | Greta Thunberg and others | Opinion

imageGreta Thunberg and her fellow climate change strikers around the world urge adults to join their fight. I t started in front of the Swedish parliament, on 20 August – a regular school day. Greta Thunberg sat with her painted sign and some homemade flyers . This was the first school climate strike . Fridays wouldn’t be regular schooldays any longer. The rest of us, and many more alongside us, picked it up in Australia, Germany, Belgium, Switzerland, New Zealand, Uganda. Today the climate strike will take place all around the world.
This movement had to happen, we didn’t have a choice.

We knew there was a climate crisis. Not just because forests in Sweden or in the US had been on fire; because of alternating floods and drought in Germany and Australia; because of the collapse of alpine faces due to melting permafrost and other climate changes. We knew, because everything we read and watched screamed out to us that something was very wrong.
That first day of refusing to go to school was spent alone, but since then a movement of climate strikers has swept the globe.

Today young people in more than 100 countries will walk out of class to demand action on the greatest threat humankind has ever faced.
These strikes are happening today – from Washington DC to Moscow, Tromsø to Invercargill, Beirut to Jerusalem, and Shanghai to Mumbai – because politicians have failed us. We’ve seen years of negotiations, pathetic deals on climate change, fossil fuel companies being given free rein to carve open our lands, drill beneath our soils and burn away our futures for their profit. We’ve seen fracking, deep sea drilling and coalmining continue.

Politicians have known the truth about climate change and they’ve willingly handed over our future to profiteers whose search for quick cash threatens our very existence.
Climate champion or climate dunce? Take this quiz to find out Read more
This movement had to happen, we didn’t have a choice. Last year’s UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change’s special report on global warming could not have been clearer about the extreme dangers of going beyond 1.5C of global warming. To have any chance of avoiding that extreme danger emissions must drop rapidly – so that by the time we will be in our mid- and late-20s we are living in a transformed world.

Play Video 2:55 ‘I want you to panic’: 16-year-old issues climate warning at Davos – video
The students who are striking in cities, towns and villages around the world are uniting behind the science. We are only asking that our leaders to do the same.
If those in power today don’t act, it will be our generation who will live through their failure.

Those who are under 20 now could be around to see 2080, and face the prospect of a world that has warmed by up to 4C. The effects of such warming would be utterly devastating. Rivers would flood, storms would wreak havoc on coastal communities and coral reefs would be eliminated. Melting polar ice caps would lead to dramatically higher sea levels, flooding coastal areas. Places on Earth will become uninhabitable.
Scientists have also shown us that burning fossil fuels is “the world’s most significant threat to children’s health”.

Nine out of every 10 children around the world are breathing dangerous air . Our lives are being compromised before we are born.

Toxic particles from exhaust fumes pass through the lungs of pregnant women and accumulate in the placenta. The risk of premature birth, low birth weight and cognitive dysfunction this causes is a public health catastrophe. Pollution from diesel vehicles is stunting the growth of our lungs, leaving us damaged for life.

Toxic air from burning fossil fuels is choking not only our lungs but our hopes and dreams.
And the worst effects of climate change are disproportionately felt by our most vulnerable communities. This is not just about cutting down emissions, but about equity – the system we have right now is failing us, working only for the rich few. The luxury so few of us enjoy in the global north is based on the suffering of people in the global south.
We have watched as politicians fumble, playing a political game rather than facing the facts that the solutions we need cannot be found within the current system.

They don’t want to face the facts – we need to change the system if we are to try to act on the climate crisis.
This movement had to happen, we didn’t have a choice.

The vast majority of climate strikers taking action today aren’t allowed to vote. Imagine for a second what that feels like.

Despite watching the climate crisis unfold, despite knowing the facts, we aren’t allowed to have a say in who makes the decisions about climate change. And then ask yourself this: wouldn’t you go on strike too, if you thought doing so could help protect your own future?
So today we walk out of school, we quit our college lessons, and we take to the streets to say enough is enough. Some adults say we shouldn’t be walking out of classes – that we should be “getting an education”. We think organising against an existential threat – and figuring out how to make our voices heard – is teaching us some important lessons.
Play Video 1:20 Thousands of UK students strike over climate change – video
Other adults keep saying: “We owe it to the young people to give them hope.

” But we don’t want your hope. We don’t want you to be hopeful. We want you to panic and we want you to take action.

We want you to join us.
We’ve relied on adults to make the right decisions to ensure that there is a future for the next generation – surely we don’t have all the answers.

But what we do know is that we need to keep fossil fuels in the ground, phase out subsidies for dirty energy production, seriously invest in renewables and start asking difficult questions about how we structure our economies and who is set to win and who is set to lose.
Young climate activists around the world: why I’m striking today | Brianna Fruean and others Read more
And we are no longer alone.

Tens of thousands of scientists from around the world have released statements in support of the strikes by children. The scientists have been very clear about what we need to do to tackle climate change. We are uniting behind the scientists. We are only asking that our leaders do the same.

It is so important that this happens now. The kind of changes that need to happen mean everyone recognising that this is a crisis and committing to radical transformations. We strongly believe that we can fight off the most damaging effects of climate change – but we have to act now.
There is no grey area when it comes to survival.

There’s no less bad option. That’s why young people are striking in every corner of the globe, and it’s why we are asking that older people join us on the streets too. When our house is burning we cannot just leave it to the children to pour water on the flames – we need the grownups to take responsibility for sparking the blaze in the first place. So for once, we’re asking grownups to follow our lead: we can’t wait any longer.
This movement had to happen. And now, you adults have a choice.
• Greta Thunberg is a youth climate strike leader in Sweden, Anna Taylor in the UK, Luisa Neubauer in Germany, Kyra Gantois, Anuna De Wever and Adélaïde Charlier in Belgium, Holly Gillibrand in Scotland, and Alexandria Villasenor in USA
Topics Environmental activism Guest edited by school climate strikers Climate change Greta Thunberg Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Europe Activism Protest comment.

Continue Reading

Technology

This Arthritis “Cure Shot” Could Bring Relief to Millions

©2019 Distractify. All rights reserved. Accept ✖ Browsers may block some cookies by default. Click accept to allow advertising partners to use cookies and serve more relevant ads. Visit our privacy policy page for more information. Source: istock By Mustafa Gatollari 2 days ago Millions of people living witharthritis just received some amazing news: a…

Editor Team

Published

on

This Arthritis “Cure Shot” Could Bring Relief to Millions

image©2019 Distractify. All rights reserved. Accept ✖ Browsers may block some cookies by default. Click accept to allow advertising partners to use cookies and serve more relevant ads.

Visit our privacy policy page for more information. Source: istock By Mustafa Gatollari
2 days ago
Millions of people living witharthritis just received some amazing news: a single injection could soon end a lot of their aches and pains.
One of the primary causes of arthritic pain directly stems from nerve growth factor, or NGF.
So scientists began asking: what if they could develop a vaccine that inhibited or completely eliminated the pain associated with NGF?
As of now, many people afflicted with arthritis have few options for dealing with their pain: they either use over the counter medicines such as ibuprofen or acetaminophen, or prescription solutions like corticosteroids and biologic response modifiers.

The problem with these treatments is they don’t last, often become ineffective after a while, and have a range of side effects, from stomach issues to lower immunity to other illnesses.
Then there’s the question of opiates, which, as anyone who’s been on them for prolonged periods of time will tell you, are rife with issues. It’s easy to become addicted and physically dependent on them. There’s a reason why a worldwide opioid epidemic , not to mention other problems associated with opiates like suppressed appetites and constipation . Source: istock
They also come with the same issue as OTC pain medications: your body becomes acclimated to the drugs, so you need more over time for effective pain relief..

It’s also worth mentioning that opiates don’t necessarily numb targeted areas of pain: your body gets put in an overall funk. So those who take the pills suffer from a dip in quality of life.
What makes this vaccine so revolutionary is the injection targets only specific joints where arthritis pain occurs.

Professor Tonia Vincent, who helped co-author a study at Oxford University regarding the treatment, made glowing remarks about the medical/scientific breakthrough, saying it’s the first of its kind. Source: istock
“This is the first successful vaccination to target pain in osteoarthritis, one of the biggest healthcare challenges of our generation,” she said.
The vaccine stimulates the body’s immune system to release antibodies that fight against NGF. It was first tested on mice with hindrances in their hind legs, a sign of osteoarthritis.

The vaccine seemed to cure their physical ailments.

The mice were no longer in visible pain and began distributing their weight evenly across all of their legs.
When doctors monitored the antibody levels in the rodents, researchers noted a marked increase.
The breakthrough could affect a huge portion of the world’s population, especially senior citizens. Out of people surveyed in the U.K ., a whopping 25 percent of those who suffer from osteoarthritis reported they weren’t provided with adequate treatment for their condition. Source: istock
Professor Tonia Vincent went on to say she’s hopeful the vaccination will be safe for wide use: “Whilst there are still safety issues that need to be considered before these types of approaches can be used in patients, we are reassured that this vaccine design allows us to control antibody levels and thus tailor treatment to individual cases according to need.


Versus Arthritis, a charity that helps those afflicted with the condition, finds the research behind the vaccine — and its potential to change the lives of millions of people for the better — game-changing. Dr.

Stephen Simpson, who is affiliated with Versus, said, “We know that for the ten million people with arthritis, persistent pain is life changing. Too many people living with pain do not get effective relief from the treatments that are currently available.” Source: fox
He continued, “And that is why the development of more effective pain killers, with fewer side-effects, is vital for people living with arthritis. Although at an early stage, this is highly innovative research and these results are very promising. We are proud to support research such as this, which aims to tackle this urgent problem and discover new ways to help people overcome pain.


What do you think? Would you or anyone you know with arthritis pain be down for a vaccine against pain associated with the condition? More from Distractify .

Continue Reading

Trending